- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 16:14:25 -0600
- To: Dimitris Dimitriadis <dimitris@ontologicon.com>
- Cc: Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>, "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>, Rob Lanphier <robla@real.com>, www-qa@w3.org
At 10:27 PM 10/18/01 +0300, Dimitris Dimitriadis wrote: >[...] >The thing I would personally like to have discussed is this: What is the >W3C _official_ position on testing, interdependancy and conformance? Given >the fact, for example, that the DOM TS has not officially been used as an >experience tank for subsequent test suites (at least not to my knowledge), >thus not coordinating this with later efforts, should there perhaps be a >clause in the specs that indicates how test suite should be written in a >coordinated fashion? I'm afraid we may be missing the forest for the trees >by moving in too many directions at once eventually ending up with >incompatible testing frameworks. This fits the goals of the QA activity, and some work on common framework will likely be prioritized as one of the early deliverables. In Section 2 of the QAWG charter, http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/charter.html, see the 2nd bullet and the 2nd-to-last bullet. -Lofton.
Received on Thursday, 18 October 2001 18:12:43 UTC