- From: Patrick Curran <Patrick.Curran@Sun.COM>
- Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 12:29:23 -0700
- To: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Cc: QAWG <www-qa-wg@w3.org>
Karl Dubost wrote: > Thanks Patrick, > > the document seems to be in a good shape, I have almost finished to > prepare it for publication. Though I have one comment. There was a > mention that we would flag an issue for versioning > > See the minutes. > > [[[ > Versioning? After discussion, decided to keep it and incorporate > DM's comments as an issue to be flagged in the document. > ]]] - http://www.w3.org/mid/5.1.0.14.2.20050912105741.023523f0@localhost > > I thought I'd done so with this text: * 2.10 Comment: add "It is unclear whether it is necessary to apply version numbers to individual tests. More common practice is to version the entire test suite. Ideally tests will not need to be revised as the specification evolves. However, this is sometimes necessary, and at a minimum each Working Group should define SpecRef and possibly other metadata such as Grouping elements to indicate which versions of the specification an individual test supports." If you think that the "it is unclear whether it is necessary" language is too vague could you perhaps suggest an alternative?
Received on Tuesday, 13 September 2005 19:29:12 UTC