- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 10:45:23 -0400
- To: "'www-qa-wg@w3.org'" <www-qa-wg@w3.org>
Le 05-06-22 à 09:46, Tim Boland a écrit : > I think we need at least one specific current example of an > "umbrella specification" to illustrate and support our current text > in ViS (since this is a new term to be in ViS but not in SpecGL, > and we have examples of other aspects in ViS already). If there > is no such example of an "umbrella specification" to be found, then > what is our motivation for describing an "umbrella > specification" (to indicate current "best practice" or to point to > a reference to aspire to for the future)? Hmm maybe not perfect examples, but still examples, that could partially apply XML Schema Part 0: Primer Second Edition http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-0/ RDF Primer http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-primer/ [[[ This is one document in a set of six (Primer, Concepts, Syntax, Semantics, Vocabulary, and Test Cases) intended to jointly replace the original Resource Description Framework specifications, RDF Model and Syntax (1999 Recommendation) and RDF Schema (2000 Candidate Recommendation). It has been developed by the RDF Core Working Group as part of the W3C Semantic Web Activity (Activity Statement, Group Charter) for publication on 10 February 2004. ]]] OWL Guide and OWL Overview but not perfect. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-guide/ At least all documents refers to http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-owl-features-20040210/#s1.1 which gives context. -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Wednesday, 22 June 2005 14:45:25 UTC