Re: Draft Agenda: Jan 26 QA WG teleconf

Regrets.

Mark

At 11:10 AM 1/21/2005 +0100, Dominique Hazaël-Massieux wrote:
>QAWG telecon participants --
>
>   Here is a draft agenda for next week teleconf; please make suggestions
>of additions/changes/updates before Monday EOB.
>
>   If you won't attend the WEDNESDAY (26 January 2005) QAWG telcon,
>please reply (to list) with "regrets". (regrets known from Karl, partial
>regrets from Lynne)
>
>The principal topic will be SpecGL LC issues resolution; please read the
>issues list before then, and even better, comment on it.
>http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?query_format=specific&order=relevance+desc&bug_status=__open__&product=QA&content=
>
>Dimitris, if you're not able to scribe that day, please find someone
>else in the group to replace you.
>
>Agenda
>   =====
>   Scribe: Dimitris
>   Chair: Dom
>   Template: http://www.w3.org/QA/Group/telcon-template.txt
>
>1.) roll call 11am EDT, membership
>
>2.) routine business
>* Technical Plenary registration: please register!
>http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35125/TP2005/registrants#qa
>
>3.) Changing teleconf day back to Monday?
>Based on the quick email survey, there seems to be a small preference to
>get back to meeting on Mondays. We need to confirm this, and decide the
>next meeting dates.
>
>4.) Test FAQ updates:
>AI-20050111-03: DH to provide example of TCMS? (not yet done)
>AI-20050111-04: TB to provide pointer to CSS Selectors Implementation
>Report Template? (integrated in test FAQ?)
>AI-20050111-05: DH to provide XSLT stylesheet used in HTML? (not yet
>done)
>AI-20050111-06: LH to provide pointer to legal issues document?
>(status?)
>AI-20050111-07: PC to create issues list related to TEST FAQ? (status?)
>AI-20050111-08: PC/DH to "formally" publish revised TEST FAQ (with
>date/version) in WG space within several weeks (status?)
>
>5.) SpecGL issues
>@@@ hopefully a pre-analysis of the issues will be sent by then; feel
>free to make comments on them beforehand
>
>http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?query_format=specific&order=relevance+desc&bug_status=__open__&product=QA&content=
>* Conformance is not a yes/no proposition
>* Avoiding device-dependent profiles
>* Additions to error mechanism section
>* Additions to "write tests"
>* Formal vs prose language normativity
>* Modesty requirement
>* Structure/Numbering confusing
>* Scope also helps reviewers determine when the specificati...
>* Comment about HTML spec examples needs refinement
>* Case of RFC2119 terms
>* Correction to example about CSS extensibility
>* "Identify depreacted features" too strong
>
>   Logistics
>   =====
>   Zakim bridge: +1-617-761-6200
>   11:00am-12noon EST.
>   code: 7294 ("QAWG")
>   IRC, see: http://www.w3.org/QA/Group/2001/12/07-QA-logistics#telcon
>
>--
>Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/
>W3C/ERCIM
>mailto:dom@w3.org
>


****************************************************************
Mark Skall
Chief, Software Diagnostics and Conformance Testing Division
Information Technology Laboratory
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8970
Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8970

Voice: 301-975-3262
Fax: 301-590-9174
Email: skall@nist.gov
****************************************************************

Received on Sunday, 23 January 2005 05:16:38 UTC