- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 17:43:18 -0700
- To: Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Cc: QAWG <www-qa-wg@w3.org>
At 09:23 AM 1/6/2005 +0100, Dominique Hazaël-Massieux wrote: >[...] > > KD: we have been told during CR that we must have two complete > implementations > >should read "We had been told at our previous CR transition call that we >must show 2 complete implementations" This confuses me. The criterion that is used by SVG and almost everyone else is: show two implementations of each feature. That is very different from two complete implementations. Are we really being held to "two complete implementations"? If so, why is that being applied to QAWG, but to no other WGs? (This point is separate from and in addition to my belief that W3C, in defining the CR criteria of a specification like SpecGL, should not necessarily blindly follow the practices that are applied to Web technologies.) -Lofton.
Received on Friday, 7 January 2005 00:43:28 UTC