- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 10:43:37 -0500
- To: 'www-qa-wg@w3.org' <www-qa-wg@w3.org>
[Please change the topic when replying to an issue] Le 21 févr. 2005, à 10:23, Lofton Henderson a écrit : > At 09:37 AM 2/21/2005 -0500, Karl Dubost wrote: >> [...] >> #983 Example of ICS claim >> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=983 >> >> http://www.w3.org/QA/Group/2005/02/qaframe-spec/#conformance-claim-ex >> done (IMHO) > > The second reference does indeed show an example of a conformance > claim. But I don't think it has any relationship to ICS as we have > been using it. An ICS contains detail. See for example specgl's ICS: > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-qaframe-spec-20041122/specgl-ics.html IMHO, WCAG 1.0 has one http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/WAI-WEBCONTENT-19990505/full-checklist.html What the WCAG 1.0 has that you think is wrong or incomplete? -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Monday, 21 February 2005 15:44:07 UTC