- From: Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 16:22:34 +0100
- To: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 17 February 2005 15:22:36 UTC
Le mercredi 16 février 2005 à 17:01 -0500, Karl Dubost a écrit : > proposed Text > > Abstract of Changes: > title: > “Define how deprecated feature is handled by each class of > product.†> ---> “Define how deprecated feature is handled.†I think either "each" is missing, or you need a plural form here (that was already that way in the old text, though). > Technique #1: > “Consider the effect of deprecation on all classes of products that > implement the specification (e.g., authoring tools, converter, user > agents).†> ---> “Consider the effect of deprecation on all products that implement > the > specification (e.g., authoring tools, converter, user agents).†Hmm... I think this makes it worse, rather than better; the concern that the XML Core WG raised was that they would have to list all the potential products implemeting the specs; listing classes of products is much practical/logical than listing all products... Dom -- Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/ W3C/ERCIM mailto:dom@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 17 February 2005 15:22:36 UTC