- From: Lynne S. Rosenthal <lsr@email.nist.gov>
- Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 19:56:45 +0000
- To: <karl@w3.org>, <www-qa-wg@w3.org>
This makes sense. And since I was waffling and since Karl would be the one who would do the work to publish and since the document gas a change log and since we may bolt create another version of this and yada yada. Let's do option 1 -----Original Message----- From: www-qa-wg-request@w3.org <www-qa-wg-request@w3.org> To: 'www-qa-wg@w3.org' <www-qa-wg@w3.org> Sent: Thu Aug 25 15:44:23 2005 Subject: Re: New QA Framework Primer - version 2005-08-24 Le 05-08-25 à 08:28, Dominique Hazaël-Massieux a écrit : > I strongly suggest Option1; given how informal the primer is, I think > putting on ourselves the burdden of maintaining a succession of > versions > that nobody would ever look at is just a very bad idea. > > (that said, having the date of last modification visible somewhere > would > certainly be a good thing) > I would prefer this as well. -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Thursday, 25 August 2005 20:03:42 UTC