- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 15:02:50 -0600
- To: "'www-qa-wg@w3.org'" <www-qa-wg@w3.org>
Just to clarify a little more... At 02:04 PM 8/21/2005 -0600, Lofton Henderson wrote: [...] >As I read the QAH, and considering the past year's experience [with >SpecGL], I can think of little improvements that would make it [QAH] >stylistically better, but not really substantively different. For example, shortening the wording of some GPs and GLs, and possibly moving the extra wording into "What Means?" or "Why Care?". This would slightly improve the document quality, without really changing its utility. -Lofton. >IMO, this is not a good use of our (my) resources now, because of the >relatively little attention that QAH gets, and because applying resources >to templates is much more useful. Therefore I am resisting "gratuitous" >editorial improvement, that doesn't clarify or update the information.
Received on Sunday, 21 August 2005 21:02:48 UTC