- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 16:25:24 -0400
- To: "'www-qa-wg@w3.org'" <www-qa-wg@w3.org>
Hi David, Le 05-08-16 à 15:50, david_marston@us.ibm.com a écrit : > Two items: > 1. I am skeptical about the word "completes" regarding the DOM > levels, unless the DOM WG used that word themselves. We should ask Philippe Le Hégaret or Dimitris :) I would say yes, but I'm ready to change if needed. > 2. Does XHTML have a "core" or mandatory piece? The drawing implies > that no single module is needed by all implementations. The drawing implies that *every* modules is needed by all implementations. :) But that could be specified in the text around the graphics to make it really clear. It's not defined like that. XHTML 1.1 is a full set of technology with no optional modules. Using XHTML Modularization it is possible to define new modules [[[ 3.1. XHTML Host Language Document Type Conformance … The DTD which defines the document type must include, at a minimum, the Structure, Hypertext, Text, and List modules defined in this specification. … ]]] - http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xhtml-modularization-20010410/ conformance.html#s_conform_document_type Plus in XHTML 1.1 [[[ The XHTML 1.1 document type is made up of the following XHTML modules. The elements, attributes, and minimal content models associated with these modules are defined in "Modularization of XHTML" [XHTMLMOD]). The elements are listed here for information purposes, but the definitions in "Modularization of XHTML" should be considered definitive. In the on-line version of this document, the module names in the list below link into the definitions of the modules within the current version of "Modularization of XHTML". (…here the list of modules…) ]]] - http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/doctype.html#s_doctype -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Tuesday, 16 August 2005 20:25:28 UTC