Saturday, 30 April 2005
- Final Minutes QA WG Teleconference 25 April 2005
- Re: [draft] Agenda: May 2nd 2005 QA WG Teleconf
- Re: [draft] Agenda: May 2nd 2005 QA WG Teleconf
Friday, 29 April 2005
- Re: CSS examples of umbrella specifications?
- [draft] answer to Dave Marston comment on Conformance section for a technology or for a specification (005)
- [draft] answer to Dave Marston comment on What's a core module
- Re: [draft] Agenda: May 2nd 2005 QA WG Teleconf
- [draft] answer to TAG, Marston comment on Suggestions of examples for section 2.3
- [draft] answer to TAG comment on Text in example of section 2.3 needs fixing
- [draft] Agenda: May 2nd 2005 QA WG Teleconf
- Re: Draft Proposed Answer to Ian Hickson Structure Numbering Confusin g
- Draft Proposed Answer to Ian Hickson: Modesty requirement
- Draft Proposed Answer to Ian Hickson:Formal vs prose language nor mativity
- Draft Proposed Answer to Ian Hickson: Additions to "write tests"
- Draft Proposed Answer to Ian Hickson: Additions to error mechanis m section
- Draft Proposed Answer to Ian Hickson: Correction to example about CSS extensibility
- Draft Proposed Answer to Ian Hickson: Avoiding device-dependent p rofiles
- Draft Proposed Answer to Ian Hickson: Case of RFC2119 terms
- Draft Proposed Answer to Ian Hickson: Comment about HTML spec exa mples needs refinement
- Draft Proposed Answer to Ian Hickson: Scope also helps reviewers determine when the specificati...
- Draft Proposed Answer to Ian Hickson: Conformance is not a yes/no proposition (wrt filling an ICS)
- Draft Proposed Answer to Ian Hickson Structure Numbering Confusin g
Thursday, 28 April 2005
Wednesday, 27 April 2005
- Re: [Draft-SpecGL] Umbrella specifications version 2
- Re: [Draft-SpecGL] Umbrella specifications
- Re: [Draft-SpecGL] Umbrella specifications
- [Draft-SpecGL] Umbrella specifications
Tuesday, 26 April 2005
- Re: [www-qa-wg] <none>
- Re: Conformance Table
- Re: [www-qa-wg] <none>
- Re: [www-qa-wg] <none>
- Conformance Table
- Proposed revised "status of this document"
Monday, 25 April 2005
- Re: SpecGL implementation report, first version
- Re: SpecGL implementation report, first version
- DRAFT minutes: QA WG Teleconference 25 April 2005
- style and markup for RFC keywords
- Re: SpecGL implementation report, first version
- Re: [draft] answers to multiple WAI CG comments re: SpecGL
- Re: SpecGL implementation report, first version
- Final Minutes -- QA Working Group Teleconference 2005-04-18
Thursday, 21 April 2005
Monday, 25 April 2005
- RE: SpecGL ICS for SpecGL
- RE: SpecGL ICS for SpecGL
- RE: SpecGL ICS for SpecGL
- [draft] Proposed answer to TAG issue on SpecGL ICS
- SpecGL implementation report, first version
Sunday, 24 April 2005
Friday, 22 April 2005
- Re: New draft of Test FAQ
- Re: change to SpecGL Requirement 03 re: Issue 1089?
- Re: New draft of Test FAQ
- Re: SpecGL ICS for SpecGL
- RE: [DRAFT] Agenda: April 25th 2005 QA WG teleconf
- Re: SpecGL ICS for SpecGL
- [draft] answers to multiple WAI CG comments re: SpecGL
- RE: New draft of Test FAQ
- RE: change to SpecGL Requirement 03 re: Issue 1089?
- New draft of Test FAQ
Thursday, 21 April 2005
- [DRAFT] Agenda: April 25th 2005 QA WG teleconf
- change to SpecGL Requirement 03 re: Issue 1089?
- SpecGL ICS for SpecGL
- Re: oddities in our Conformance Model
Wednesday, 20 April 2005
- Re: oddities in our Conformance Model
- Re: SVG Tiny 1.2: reviewers guide
- Time frame for the comment answers to QA Spec GL
- Re: oddities in our Conformance Model
- Re: oddities in our Conformance Model
- Re: oddities in our Conformance Model
- oddities in our Conformance Model
- Re: SVG Tiny 1.2: reviewers guide
- [revised draft] Answer to comment about "Non-specification specifications"
- Re: ISSUE 1148 - Text difficult to understand in the example
- Re: ISSUE 1148 - Text difficult to understand in the example
- Re: ISSUE 1148 - Text difficult to understand in the example
- Re: [draft] Answer to comment about "Non-specification specifications"
- Re: ISSUE 1149 - Example about Unicode
- Re: ISSUE 1148 - Text difficult to understand in the example
Tuesday, 19 April 2005
- [draft] Answer to comment about "Non-specification specifications"
- [draft] Answer to comment on the term "Umbrella specification"
- [draft] Answer to comment on "parsing the definition of specification"
- [draft] Answer to comment on "confusing structure and numbering"
- [draft] Answer to comment on "Specifying conformance" wording
- ISSUE 1149 - Example about Unicode
- [draft] answer to TAG comment on ICS needs more than y/n/n-a
- [draft] answer to TAG comment on wording in tips
- [draft] answer to TAG comment on Conformance clause optionality
- [draft] Proposed answer to TAG comment on workflow
- [draft] answer to TAG comment on a more detailed table of contents
- ISSUE 1148 - Text difficult to understand in the example
- [draft] answer to TAG comment on unclear legend for illustration section 4.1
- Status of proposed answers
- [draft] Proposed answer to TAG comment on using our own example
- [draft] Proposed answer to TAG comment on error processing requirements
- [draft] Proposed answer to TAG comment on editorial comments
- [draft] Proposed answer to TAG comment on extensions and conformance
- [draft] Proposed answer to TAG issue on positive statements for non applicability
- [draft] Proposed answer to DanC's comment on untested hooks
- Final minutes QA WG telcon 20050411
Monday, 18 April 2005
- Draft Minutes -- QA Working Group Teleconference 2005-04-18
- Final Minutes - QA Working Group Teleconference 04-April-2005
- Sending and announcing final teleconf minutes
- Re: Final Agenda: April 18th 2005 QA WG teleconf and AI completed
- Final Agenda: April 18th 2005 QA WG teleconf
Saturday, 16 April 2005
Friday, 15 April 2005
- New SpecGL WG Draft
- Re: Proposal re: AI-20050411-1
- Re: Proposal re: AI-20050411-1
- Re: Dublin Consensus: Mon-Wed (8-10 August)
Thursday, 14 April 2005
Wednesday, 13 April 2005
- Re: Addressing accessibility in SpecGL (was: Draft minutes telcon 20050411)
- Addressing accessibility in SpecGL (was: Draft minutes telcon 20050411)
- Draft Agenda: April 18th 2005 QA WG teleconf
- Proposed assignments for drafting answers to LC comments
Tuesday, 12 April 2005
Monday, 11 April 2005
- Re: Draft minutes telcon 20050411
- Re: Final Agenda: April 11th 2005 QA WG teleconf
- Draft minutes telcon 20050411
- Re: Final Agenda: April 11th 2005 QA WG teleconf
- RE: Final Agenda: April 11th 2005 QA WG teleconf
- Re: Final Agenda: April 11th 2005 QA WG teleconf
- old issues CR45 - CR57
- Final Agenda: April 11th 2005 QA WG teleconf
- starting Disposition of Comments document
- My action item AI-20050404-20 is done
Sunday, 10 April 2005
Friday, 8 April 2005
- RE: Draft Agenda: April 11th 2005 QA WG teleconf
- Draft Agenda: April 11th 2005 QA WG teleconf
- Re: definition of Specficiation
Wednesday, 6 April 2005
Tuesday, 5 April 2005
- Re: New draft of Test FAQ: for discussion during April 4 telecon
- Re: Test FAQ - example of test suite with versions
- Re: Draft Minutes - QA Working Group Teleconference - 04-April-2005
- Draft Minutes - QA Working Group Teleconference - 04-April-2005
- Re: Editors draft of test faq on QA WG site
- Test FAQ - example of test suite with versions
- final decision -- Aug f2f days
- Re: New draft of Test FAQ: for discussion during April 4 telecon
- Editors draft of test faq on QA WG site
Monday, 4 April 2005
- Re: examples for TestFAQ
- examples for TestFAQ
- Re: New draft of Test FAQ: for discussion during April 4 telecon
- Final agenda: April 4 2005 QA WG teleconf
- New draft of Test FAQ: for discussion during April 4 telecon