- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 07:21:54 -0600
- To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
I had an action item to revive an issue which is #7 in the new issues list [0]. I don't really have anything new to add to the discussion the last time this was argued, in [1]. So mostly I'll summarize those arguments. The text of SpecLite was changed in 2ndPWD [2], despite the fact that there was never any QAWG consensus on the debated points of [1]. CR text of SpecGL [4] contained two checkpoints about normative content and language: Checkpoint 7.1. Use conformance key words. Checkpoint 7.2. Distinguish normative and informative content. Roughly speaking, these deal respectively with "micro level" and "macro level" of expressing and identifying normative content. 7.1 is the micro level -- the language used for expression of individual conformance requirements. 7.1 was one of the most debated issues of SpecGL LC-to-CR transition -- we even had a teleconference to which we invited Ian Jacobs to express his opinion. 7.2 is the macro level -- overall, identify what parts of the specification are normative and what parts are informative. CR SpecGL required that both of these be addressed in the conformance clause, because all important conformance-related information should be findable starting there. FPWD of SpecGL [3] preserved both of these checkpoints. 7.2 became the 3rd Good Practice of section A.1 (provide a Conformance Clause). It was to be repeated in C.2, or referenced from there. The reason that it was in section A is that we decided to "front load" the most important PRs and GPs -- put them in the beginning so that major benefit could be obtained by doing the first bits. The current WG draft has ... [0] http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2004/09/qaspec-issues [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2004Aug/0090.html [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/qaframe-spec/ [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-qaframe-spec-20040602/ [4] http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-qaframe-spec-20031110/guidelines-chapter#Gd-support-conventions
Received on Thursday, 28 October 2004 13:22:02 UTC