- From: Lynne Rosenthal <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>
- Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2004 10:15:33 -0400
- To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
Again, grammar, typo, editorial. *** Consistency of terms: we use both ‘implementor’ and ‘developer’ – we need to pick one and stick to it. A2. Specify hot to make conformance claims 1. GP Provide the working for conformance claims Techniques – are these 1 technique with multiple steps or multiple techniques? 2. GP Provide an Implementation Conformance Statement proforma -What does it mean?, last sentence. /questionnaire for implementor/questionnaire for the implementer/ -Why care /ICS provides detail about/ICS provides a concise view of a specification’s conformance model/ -Technique #5 reword: Provide a tool to help implementers fill out the ICS and produce a report (e.g., EARL) 3. GP Require an Implementation Conformance Statement as part of valid conformance claims. -Technique #1 Reword: Explain in the conformance claim section why the implementer must complete the ICS for part of the claim.
Received on Friday, 8 October 2004 14:15:31 UTC