- From: Andrew Thackrah <andrew@opengroup.org>
- Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 14:31:05 +0000
- To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
Lofton Henderson wrote: > Comment embedded.... > > At 12:37 PM 3/12/04 +0000, Andrew Thackrah wrote: > >> Here's a thought about Principle #4 >> >> If the TS is being used to make conformance claims then the impact on >> conformance of making any change to the TS must be considered. SNIP >> >> This implies: >> * The meaning/value of a conformance claim may change as the test >> suite evolves. >> o Instructions on making conformance claims should address this > > > That's a good point. > > In SpecLite, "how to make a Conformance Claim" is one of the dozen+ > items that survived. Since our new approach is to clearly and > completely develop each of a much-reduced number of topics -- with > explanation, examples, markup, tools, templates, etc -- would this cover > your point? Or are you suggesting that something about this belongs in > TestTL also or instead? It's the issue the links test suites to conformance claims so I think that it should be addressed in both places. An example might be the best way to get this across - I'll have a think... -Andrew
Received on Thursday, 18 March 2004 09:31:31 UTC