- From: Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 11:38:40 +0100
- To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
- Message-Id: <1075199920.9838.312.camel@stratustier>
Hi, As agreed during our teleconference yesterday, here is a proposed updated version of the Test Survey; I've tried to integrate the comments from the Nov 26 telecon [1] and also the input from Lofton "Test show & tell" [2]; I've published it in our WG space: http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2004/01/test-survey Here is included the 1st version for your convenience; please send your comments ASAP so that we can launch this survey next week. survey starts here ------------------------------ The QA Working Group is working on gathering experiences of Test Materials development, so as to better match its deliverables with other Working Groups needs and expectations. We would appreciate if you could take the time to answer to the following questions; if some of these are not applicable to your situation, please let us know why. If any of these questions is unclear for you, do not hesitate to contact dom@w3.org to get more details. 1) Name of the WG Specifications for which you have developed or are developing Test Materials (if you have not developed test materials yet, you can answer the questions following the way you plan to do so) 2) Describe the relationships between the specifications development and the test material developments (e.g. Test Suite built during CR, or test cases developed along each feature in the spec, ...)? 3) What process do you follow to develop your test materials? e.g. how are new test cases developed, approved, ... (if the process is described somewhere on the Web, please give us its URI) 4) Describe the information typically associated with a test case in your test suite (e.g. name, status, link to specification, ...) 5) What is the intended coverage of your test suite? (e.g. "each feature is tested" or "only difficult features are tested","features at risk are tested", ...) 6) What parts of your test suite(s) are automated (if any)? Did you use existing tools to provide this automation or did you develop new ones? 7) What is (are) the most challenging aspect(s) you encounter in the development of the test materials? 8) What benefits (if any) did the Working Group get from the development of these test materials? 9) Any other input you would like to share about your experiences on these topics. ------------------------------ survey ends here 1. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2003Dec/0002.html 2. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2003Dec/0002.html -- Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/ W3C/ERCIM mailto:dom@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 27 January 2004 17:04:24 UTC