- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 10:28:40 -0500
- To: dom@w3.org (Dominique Haza l-Massieux)
- Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org
> 3.) Presentation by Sandro Hawke of the work done by the OWL > WG and the RDF WG for the development of their test materials > and the gathering of the tests results. A few references: > - OWL Test repository: http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/ > - OWL Test Cases document: http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-test/ > - OWL Test Results: http://www.w3.org/2003/08/owl-systems/test-results-out > - RDF Test Cases: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-testcases/ > - RDF Test Results: http://www.w3.org/2003/11/results/rdf-core-tests > > [hopefully Sandro will send other references to complete those] Sorry, just getting back from vacation now. Here are my notes for the session. -- sandro =================================================================== 1 Introduction This is Mostly a Story about a Web Page Prolog: A Test-Driven Implementation of OWL ("Surnia") Effects the page has had What's next? About Me [ At home today (a bit of a cold, you may hear kids) ] - W3C Team, Semantic Web Activity, DARPA/Research Funding - Joined WebOnt (OWL) in June 2 Surnia - Immediate motivate: demonstrating implementability of OWL Full - I Didn't Read The Spec! I just implemented based on my rough idea, then modified to pass more and more tests. - Results were decent - Also for RDF Core entailment & non-entailment tests 3 The Test Results Page 3.1 Test Results Ontology (for reporting results in RDF) - TestRun (PassingRun, FailingRun, IncompleteRun / UndecidedRun) + which test + where is the output (details of the run) + which system was tested (NOT tracking Project/Release/Platform/etc) + time test began + test duration 3.2 Test Results Page -- First Version SEE: http://www.w3.org/2003/08/owl-systems/res20030904 - big table of tests/systems - regen at bottom - self-explanitory 3.3 Feeds - give me the URL of your test data - results page let people try it themselves, to do some debugging - some people advertised their results telling people to do a custom version of the page! - various bugs in their systems and a few in mine 3.4 Test Results Refinements NOW: http://www.w3.org/2003/08/owl-systems/test-results-out - group tests - leave out systems with no results for a group - summary table at top - group by number-passed/failed 4 Effects? 4.1 Working Group - helped us decide which test to look at more closely, approve, move to extra-credit - let us push implementors on key tests 4.2 Implementors - could see who was doing what, get some publicity (not enough system data per test, though, IMHO -- output link) 4.3 W3C Members and Director - for advancement to PR -- Director liked it; I hope the members do 5 What's next? 5.1 Test Suite stable now, as we're at PR - non-normative tests from WG? - tests from other submitters? 5.2 Page usability - smaller bits! searchable! - better info/links about implementations 5.3 More info on page - benchmarking - change-over-time - nuances of test results (use of "output" link?) - facilitating *discussion* of tests
Received on Monday, 5 January 2004 10:29:59 UTC