- From: Lynne Rosenthal <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>
- Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 13:47:17 -0500
- To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
Comments on Test FAQ In general, the document is addressing an excellent set of items (questions), is at the right level and tone. A suggestion is to number the questions so we can more easily identify which one we are addressing. 1. What kinds of testing, a) 5th paragraph: "Somewhat less attention seems to be focused on conformance test development". We should state this more positive, especially since we are proponents of conformance. Additionally, I disagree, there is more and more focus on conformance within W3C and in other organizations. Suggest rewording: Over the last several years, more attention has been focused on conformance test development and more groups have been developing conformance tests. b) last para. s/these kinds of testing/conformance and interoperability testing/ 2. When should test develop start a) 1st and 3rd paragraph: It may be confusing that para 1 says plan early and para 3 says, its best to wait to develop tests. I understand that it is addressing different aspects, but it took me a second to realize that - the words 'early' and 'wait' caught my attention, and I had to reread to understand the difference. Is there a better way to describe this? This is not an objection to what is there, but a question to consider. b) 2nd para, 1st sentence s/define/identify/ 3. How should I package and publish a) para 3. how to make a conformance claim What is meant here. SpecGL discusses how to make a conformance claim. Does this mean the same thing? If so, I object to it being here - we shouldn't encourage test developers to do this. b) para 3 last sentence. A complete test suite will contain some or all of the following. Given this statement and that 'tests' are in the list, then can I conclude that a test suite can contain only 'tests' ? Or that 'tests' are NOT part of a test suite. Perhaps, since tests are a given, reword as: "A complete test suites will contain tests and some or all of the following" 4. What should the test documentation cover Again, how to make a conformance claim item should be deleted or clarified 5. Should I automate test execution What is missing here is something we found out - if you make it easy, people will use the tests. Suggest we add something along this line. regards Lynne
Received on Wednesday, 22 December 2004 18:52:21 UTC