- From: Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 10:08:52 +0100
- To: Patrick Curran <Patrick.Curran@sun.com>
- Cc: QAWG <www-qa-wg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <1103101732.25117.356.camel@stratustier>
Le mer 15/12/2004 à 09:44, Patrick Curran a écrit : > Attached is a brief draft for a "Test FAQ" for discussion at tomorrow's > telecon. Excellent start! I like the tone and style a lot. My only quick comment is that the FAQ mostly works also for interop testing, and that as such the two 1st questions should be reworded to take it into account, e.g.: * "What is conformance testing, and how does it differ from other kinds of testing?" -> "What is the difference between conformance testing, interoperability testing and other kinds of testing?" * add a paragraph in the 1st question defining interoperability testing: "Interoperability testing focuses on finding interoperability issues between implementations of a given specification. It complements conformance testing in so that it can also detect defects in specifications - ambiguities, inaccuracies, etc. As such, it is usefully conducted in parallel with the specification development." * in "Why is conformance testing important?", add an introductory paragraph like "While interoperability testing happens more and more often in W3C to help assess the Proposed Recommendation entrance criteria, very few groups have been working on conformance testing." Another possible point of discussion: should this be a simple document in QA WG space or be published as a Working Group Note? I guess I have a preference for a Working Group Note, given that this incorporates some of the important work we've been doing in this area. In this case, I guess it should supersede testGL on the TR page. The main drawback is that it reduces the ease to add/change questions, which may be an issue for a FAQ... Things I would like to see added during the polishing phase: links to the Wiki for further discussions of some of the items; more links to the examples given in the text; links to the documents developed by the CSS and SVG WG on developing test suites. But that said, I think keeping the document somewhat short should be one of design goals. Thanks, Dom -- Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/ W3C/ERCIM mailto:dom@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 15 December 2004 09:09:07 UTC