- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 06:59:37 -0500
- To: Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>, Lynne Rosenthal <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>
- Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org
At 10:29 AM 8/20/2004 +0200, Dominique Hazaël-Massieux wrote: >Le jeu 19/08/2004 à 21:50, Lynne Rosenthal a écrit : > > Looking at this, I propose that we delete it. It states the obvious. It > > presents something that everyone already does. > > > > FYI -Currently it says: > > Make a list of normative and non-normative references > > GP: start now and keep adding to it as you go. > >I think Björn raised an important question about normative references >that would be worth adding to SpecGL: Actually, as I recall, that thread raised a number of meaty topics. IMO there is definitely some significant material here, if we want to deal with it. -Lofton. >when making a normative reference, >you need to see how future versions of the said specification may affect >your own document, and also possibly address the way you "use" the >conformance model of the referred specification; see also our discussion >during July 26 teleconf: >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2004Aug/0066.html > >I agree that the current GP is not much useful, though. > >Dom >-- >Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/ >W3C/ERCIM >mailto:dom@w3.org
Received on Friday, 20 August 2004 12:59:48 UTC