Re: SpecGL advanced topics

LH>> Understanding & Managing Specification Variability

DHM>I like that one too, but I'll stick with the simpler "Variability
DHM>in Specifications" for now.

I agree with Dom. We don't want to make the topic seem difficult. Most
WGs will need it; it's an exceptional technology that will have so
little variability that this document can be safely ignored by the
spec editors. There may be some WGs that ultimately issue specs with
extensibility but no profiles/modules/levels, but who should have at
least some of their people be familiar with the DoV landscape.
.................David Marston