LH>> Understanding & Managing Specification Variability DHM>I like that one too, but I'll stick with the simpler "Variability DHM>in Specifications" for now. I agree with Dom. We don't want to make the topic seem difficult. Most WGs will need it; it's an exceptional technology that will have so little variability that this document can be safely ignored by the spec editors. There may be some WGs that ultimately issue specs with extensibility but no profiles/modules/levels, but who should have at least some of their people be familiar with the DoV landscape. .................David MarstonReceived on Wednesday, 18 August 2004 10:53:41 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:43:37 UTC