- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 11:13:38 -0600
- To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
Anyone who remembers, please let me know the answers to #1 and #2 below. I'm working on QAH editing now, and need clarification of a couple details from the end of last telecon... At 02:12 PM 7/27/2004 +0100, andrew@opengroup.org wrote: >[...] > LH: we agreed to split out appendix - primer & usage scenarios as a > seperate doc. > Follow links on the mail [2] I just sent: item (2). QAH now references > QA roadmap. > It's unclear what status of roadmap will be. #1: In the initial breakout, I made it a W3C "WG NOTE". Did we reach any conclusion here, what we want it to be at the next QAH publication (now planned for 8/27)? > > Regarding items 3,4,5: people might want to look at these and respond by > email > > LR: Re. QAPD->TSPD: I recal from f2f that we discovered that all > different WGs > called it a 'test process' document > > DH: Using 'TS' makes it too specialized - no room for non-test subjects > to be added. > > LH: 90% of material is related to tests. but we don't restrict addition of > non-test material in there. So maybe we shouldn't clamp down the scope yet. #2: So ... did we decide to leave it as QAPD for this pub cycle? Or to change it to TSPD? Regards, -Lofton. > [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2004Jul/0061.html
Received on Wednesday, 11 August 2004 20:28:53 UTC