- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 15:31:31 -0400
- To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
- Message-Id: <0E01D1F0-E716-11D8-91B3-000A95718F82@w3.org>
Principle: Provide the wording for conformance claims. What does it mean? Claiming conformance to a technology is required in certain conditions, therefore it is important to give users the possibility to make such claims without ambiguities. Identification of the specification version, of the class of products, of the degree of conformance are some of the items that could be part of such wording. It will cover the different possible usage of the specification. Why should I care? Having a more or less uniform way of claiming conformance for particular usage of the technology will avoid confusion of people who are interested by such claims. It can happen in many different context which can be legal for policies and laws, or commercial when selling a product. Related: • Conformance claims are closely related to issues of logos & branding. See @@Sec.X.Y@@ of The QA Handbook [QA-HANDBOOK]. Techniques: 1. Identify all variabilities of the specification: class of products, modules, profiles, levels, extensions. 2. Give all information identifying uniquely the specification: name, versioning, date. 3. Write the wording of your conformance claims including this information: • the specification name, • the specification version, • the degree of conformance satisfied, • information about the subject which is claiming conformance, • the date of the claim. 4. The specification should require that conformance claims contain at least this information. Examples [Ed note. WAI specs have some good examples.] -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Thursday, 5 August 2004 17:56:24 UTC