At 07:18 PM 8/3/2004 -0400, Lynne Rosenthal wrote: >[...] >>Technique >> 1. Simple, complete the conformance clause template and put the >> result into the specification. >> >> """KD: Do we have a conformance template?""" Yes, SpecLite FPWD [1] has links to [2]. And [2] comes from proposals that I originally submitted to QAWG in March, and before that in January. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/qaframe-spec/ [2] http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2004/05/SpecLite-template.html >Lofton is working on something as part of the NIST deliverable. He should >have something soon. [2] was derived from old SpecHeavy (from its GLs and CPs). It's content needs revision to coordinate it with SpecLite -- most of the concepts still survive, but need to be rearranged and revised somewhat (and linked). Also it will be available in an easier-to-use form. Given the unstable state of the SpecLite text, and the energetic push to publish (in August?), Lynne and I have agreed that I should do the coordination work after the next WD publication. The next WD should (like FPWD) refer to placeholder versions. -Lofton.Received on Wednesday, 4 August 2004 16:26:30 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:43:37 UTC