- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2004 14:23:11 -0600
- To: Lynne Rosenthal <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>, Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org
At 07:18 PM 8/3/2004 -0400, Lynne Rosenthal wrote: >[...] >>Technique >> 1. Simple, complete the conformance clause template and put the >> result into the specification. >> >> """KD: Do we have a conformance template?""" Yes, SpecLite FPWD [1] has links to [2]. And [2] comes from proposals that I originally submitted to QAWG in March, and before that in January. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/qaframe-spec/ [2] http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2004/05/SpecLite-template.html >Lofton is working on something as part of the NIST deliverable. He should >have something soon. [2] was derived from old SpecHeavy (from its GLs and CPs). It's content needs revision to coordinate it with SpecLite -- most of the concepts still survive, but need to be rearranged and revised somewhat (and linked). Also it will be available in an easier-to-use form. Given the unstable state of the SpecLite text, and the energetic push to publish (in August?), Lynne and I have agreed that I should do the coordination work after the next WD publication. The next WD should (like FPWD) refer to placeholder versions. -Lofton.
Received on Wednesday, 4 August 2004 16:26:30 UTC