- From: Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 15:18:08 +0200
- To: Lynne Rosenthal <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>
- Cc: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>, www-qa-wg@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 3 August 2004 09:18:09 UTC
Hi Lynne, Le jeu 08/07/2004 à 17:05, Lynne Rosenthal a écrit : > Is it possible to extract the section (2.3) called Profiles, Modules, > Levels from the old SpecGL document. I just reread it and believe that not > only is this good information, but it can exist on its own. I've just started to look at making this section a separate Technical Report, but as it stands, it looks a bit short to make a proper note from it. Although there is no requirement that a document must be long to be published, I wonder if we should revisit our decision to make it a Working Group Note, and instead, to make a simple article in QA/WG space out of it. Or maybe we could group it with our white paper on dimensions of variability? I think it's worth discussing this on the mailing list, although the final decision should probably be made at the next teleconf (that I won't attend, FWIW); Karl, could you add this topic in the agenda? Thanks, Dom > The only minor editing that I think it needs is: > 1st paragraph - deleted 'dimensions of variability' > 5th paragraph ('Specifications may define individual profiles....), midway > down. > s/standard/specification > > I'm starting to think about and write the section D1 subdivide. > > regards > Lynne -- Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/ W3C/ERCIM mailto:dom@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 3 August 2004 09:18:09 UTC