Re: QAH draft for Wednesday

Le mar 13/04/2004 à 18:07, Lofton Henderson a écrit :
> >4. Conformance
> >Do we really need this section.  I suggest removing it.  It adds nothing 
> >and may set a bad precedent.  Since this is a Handbook, we don't violate 
> >our own rule of having a conformance section in every specification.
> 
> I was debating this.  On the one hand, we say "Every W3C TR should have a 
> Conformance section".  Are we vulnerable to criticism if the QAH does 
> not?

Given the type of document QAH is, I think we'd better get rid of the
conformance section ; of course, it doesn't hurt if we say why in the
introduction (but keep it short).

Dom
-- 
Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/
W3C/ERCIM
mailto:dom@w3.org