Re: QALites and relevant W3C documents from Lynne Rosenthal on 2004-04-09 (www-qa-wg@w3.org from April 2004)

From: Lynne Rosenthal <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2004 12:59:19 -0400
To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20040409125859.01e389e8@mailserver.nist.gov>

>
>I think SpecLite should mention what Pubrules does and point to it -- i.e. 
>"Pubrules gives @@spec naming rules@@ for subsequent specification 
>versions depending on the relative conformance characteristics of the two 
>versions".  Otherwise (SpecLite could say), the conformance relationship 
>of subsequent versions is out of scope for SpecLite, except in the case 
>that a later version deprecates features of an earlier version.
>
>This could, for example, be handled in the scope/out-of-scope section (or 
>elsewhere, if it fits better elsewhere).

Good idea.

Received on Friday, 9 April 2004 12:59:48 UTC