- From: Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: 30 Oct 2003 18:18:00 +0100
- To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>, karl@w3.org
- Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 30 October 2003 12:18:33 UTC
Hi Lofton, Karl, Some of our action items are owned by people that are no longer participating to the QA WG. Can you let me know what should be done with them, ie finding someone else to do it, or dropping the AI altogether: * AI-20021028-1: Peter, give Dom the text to be inserted in the definition section (Was : write up definitions of withdrawn and deprecated) [this is probably done, although I don't remember having seen a defintion for withdrawn] * AI-20021009-03 Kirill, Add quality items to TestGL in the form of table, similar to OpsGL [this should probably be dropped, since we dropped the table in Ops] * AI-20030218-2 KG, Send to PC a rough estimate of SOAP 1.2 spec + implementation development cost. * AI-20011112-4 Kirill, Send serialized Infoset pointer * AI-20030317-4 KG, Post LC comment on SpecGL to add to conformance disclaimer "if you fail a test"... * AI-20030501-2 JR, to send link to new grant wording. * AI-20030501-3 JR, to write a sentence on the "use" rights (details at http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/ActionItems) Let me know, Dom -- Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/ W3C/ERCIM mailto:dom@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 30 October 2003 12:18:33 UTC