- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 09:13:59 -0600
- To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
- Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20031021091230.03095b00@localhost>
David's new version (for f2f discussion) is at: http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2003/10/tcdl-20031013.html >Sensitivity: >To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com> >Subject: TCDL for discussion >X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.7 March 21, 2001 >From: david_marston@us.ibm.com >Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 10:07:33 -0400 >X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on WTFMAIL02/WTF/M/Lotus(Build >V651_10162003NP|October > 16, 2003) at 10/21/2003 10:08:17 AM >X-IMAIL-SPAM-DNSBL: (SpamCop,94568572,127.0.0.2) >X-RCPT-TO: <lofton@rockynet.com> >X-SpamCatcher-Score: 10 >X-SpamCatcher-IP: 127.0.0.1 >X-SpamCatcher-1: 521110e1c18ca83e0e4d33327e6a282a > > >---------------------- Forwarded by David Marston/Cambridge/IBM on >10/21/2003 10:06 AM --------------------------- > >From: David Marston on 10/13/2003 04:55 PM > >To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com> >cc: > >Subject: TCDL for discussion > >Below is a copy of the document for discussion within the WG. So far, I >haven't heard any objections to it being put into WG space. > >Here is the transmittal message: >"This draft shows the general organization of the TCDL 1.0 document. I >called it 1.0 to pave the way for a committee-written version in the >future, should it prove necessary after more extensive field use. >Nevertheless, I think the full TCDL 1.0 will apply to a broad range of >classes of product and will also suffice for large suites that last over >several versions of their target specs. The ultimate document will be >about 6-8 times as large as this, mostly in chapters 3 and 4. An example >section of chapters 2 and 3 is provided, but no section anywhere in the >document should be assumed to be at full length. Sections of chapter 1 are >nearly full length, at least in my view. My main question for the WG right >now: is this document likely to serve for at least a couple years, so tha >QAWG can turn its attention to complementary material and practices?" > >
Received on Tuesday, 21 October 2003 11:21:22 UTC