- From: Olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 14:43:56 +0900
- To: david_marston@us.ibm.com
- Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org
On Tuesday, Oct 7, 2003, at 04:10 Asia/Tokyo, david_marston@us.ibm.com wrote: > I noted the Call for Participation for WWW2004 [1] and looked for ways > that I or QAWG could participate, aiming to broaden the buy-in for the > Guidelines documents and other activities to come. Given the rapid pace > of the QA work, I think a panel is a good idea. I'd second the idea of a panel as medium of choice. Most probably the best way to have a lively session about rather dense topics. > Detailed topic: discussing how the W3C (through WGs) will present a > more > integrated view of its requirements in the future, by providing tests > in > addition to specs. This is hard to do with volunteer/contributed > efforts > in the WGs. > > Panel: mix of points of view among a purist/idealist, pragmatist, > victim > of poor past practices, implementer of a W3C spec, possibly a spec > editor, > possibly a trainer/author. (Other ideas?) Moderator is a QA > professional. Why not include spec authors from other bodies? I am certain the panel moderator could choose participants clever enough to be constructive and resist the "troll appeal". There is some danger to that, but I feel this could be more rewarding than a "W3C only" panel, which, with the already ample W3C track, may not please the organizers much anyway. -- olivier
Received on Tuesday, 7 October 2003 01:44:54 UTC