- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 17:05:16 -0600
- To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
Lynne (or anyone) -- I'm updating lc-issues to incorporate some missed SpecGL resolutions and closures. I have a question about LC-29.5 [1]. At the 20030505 telecon [2] we resolved not to change the text of GL9 to talk about "useful" forms of extensibility, but to leave that discussion for SpecET. Lynne's processing plan proposal for 29.5 [3] had a 2nd part, which was: "Add CP to require specs to specify how an implementation should handle extensions it doesn't understand e.g., ignore and continue." There was some email discussion after the processing plan, and I remember we discussed it (e.g., the problem of what's an unknown extension, versus what's erroneous or corrupted content). But I can't find any record of resolution, nor can I remember it. Anyone remember what we decided? -Lofton. [1] http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/lc-issues#x29 [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2003Apr/0034.html [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2003Apr/0204.html
Received on Thursday, 29 May 2003 19:04:52 UTC