Re: Monday (17 Mar) QAWG telecon agenda (DRAFT)


I'd like to take part of Monday to nail down just a few things for
TestGL if possible.

I'm sorry to say that I was pretty much out of it for the last few days
with a cold so if the Editors of TestGL responded to my note earlier in
the week to my work address, I haven't seen the response yet. Given
that, I'd love to get a quick commitment from the TestGL editors on who
is going to work on what and when they might have stuff to me to merge
into the document (and so I know what it is I'm writing my self other
than the merging as I'm sure there will be some...).

And for a more substantive issue, there seems to me to be one unresolved
issue before going forward with the new outline that I'd like to
discuss, that is, is Guideline 4 sufficient with the one checkpoint. I
don't really think so and I'd love to hear what else folks think belong
in here. 

Guideline 4 concerns the actual development of the test suite. Currently
the only listed checkpoint is to prototype stuff. It's a really good
idea but I think that there should be more than just this (or if it
really is, just this, it should likely be moved to a different guideline
so it's not all alone...). Of course at the same time we are trying to
avoid setting specific restrictions that would hinder folks from
developing a suite in a way that makes sense for them but we didn't


On Sat, 2003-03-15 at 15:37, Lofton Henderson wrote:
> QAWG participants --
> If you won't attend the Monday (17-mar) QAWG telcon, please reply (to
> list) with "regrets". 
> This is a regular weekly conference, whose principal topic will be ...
> TBD!
> Agenda comments and suggestions welcome.  
> The overflow half-hour is free, if you want to use it.
> Agenda 
> =====
> Scribe:  Patrick Curran
> 1.) roll call 11am (ET), membership
> 2.) QAWGPD [1] finish
>         - Part 2 of 3 was unfinished at Boston [2]
>         - handful of ancient issues to dispose of, see [2]
> ...Then what?  Ideas are welcome...
> x.) LC Issues?  Problem is, no one has had a chance to look at 'em,
> and there will be a bunch more to be added during the next week.  None
> of the Lead Editors have had a chance to categorize and organize
> them.  Perhaps we could look at the major-reorg issue for OpsGL (LR &
> PC raised issues) and for SpecGL (LH raised one), and start to talk
> about them.
> y.) Peter might want some time for TestGL
> 4.) Adjourn
> 5.) Overflow (12-12:30):  available.
> Logistics 
> =====
> Zakim bridge: +1-617-761-6200 
> Monday, 9 December
> 11:00am-12noon EST. 
> code: 7294 ("QAWG")
> IRC:
> Regards, 
> -Lofton.
> [1]
> [2]
pfawcett <>

Received on Sunday, 16 March 2003 17:56:14 UTC