- From: Dimitris Dimitriadis <dimitris@ontologicon.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 05:46:47 +0100
- To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
- Cc: ot@w3.org
- Message-Id: <AFC04BD3-29D6-11D7-9F71-000393556882@ontologicon.com>
All, Attached please find the new version of the TTF charter, in time for AC contacts, as requested earlier this week. All minuted changes from the F2F were incorporated (except for the part on templates of test materials, which I cannot remember having either voted for or abstained from voting on during the F2F according to an earlier email to the list). For the archives, I again want to stress that I do not agree that we should strive for not enforcing that test techniques as defined and discussed in other QA WG materials be used. Our current wording (on which we reached consensus during the F2F) is "ensure". I cannot, on the one hand, understand what makes "ensure" different from "enforce", except if "ensure" means that we just check for something having been done by someone else (which means that in order to ensure, someone needs to have enforced, except for cases where all gets done voloutarily); on the other I think this is merely words and that it does not really make that big a difference. Again, I updated the draft as per the minutes, but I want it archived that I do not agree with this weaker wording. Some group needs to enforce that things be done, if not this group then some other. However, as this is my personal view and not that of the QA WG, the TTF charter does not reflect that. As for AI-20030108-2, assuring uniformity means, as mentioned in the updated draft, that QA WG "approved" test techniques as per our documents are used as much as possible (the set of those tools defining uniform use). Olivier, please update the action items list accordingly. /Dimitris
Attachments
- text/html attachment: qawgttf.html
Received on Thursday, 16 January 2003 23:45:59 UTC