- From: Patrick Curran <Patrick.Curran@sun.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 17:49:03 -0800
- To: W3C QAWG <www-qa-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <3E5EC00F.2000501@sun.com>
OK - I'm getting the hang of this, and will now only distribute the "all.htm" file. I presume that all of you can either turn this into slides, or simply review it as is. We're running out of time here, and I'd like to wrap this up by the end of day tomorrow (Friday).While there's always room for improvement, I think that this is getting close to "good enough". Some specific questions: * Are we happy with the last two bullets on slide 1 ("Even a small investment pays big dividends" ... "DOM, SOAP, SVG Working Groups have demonstrated this")? Should we add UAAG to this list, since they're on our Success Stories slide? * How about the Success Stories slide? I provided a single link to each of three WGs' activities. Does this slide make sense? Could we add more links (eg DOM?) If so, please send suggestions. Is this slide redundant with the last bullet of the previous slide? (It does add more data - specifically, indicating the area where we think there's something worth looking at.) * I added a "Test Guidelines" slide. Do we want to keep it? Reword it? * Can anybody suggest addional links for the References slide? I will remove the "What else" when we agree that this is complete. Of course, you should all feel free to make additional suggestions for improvement. Thanks... PS: a procedural issue. We talked about producing "Quick Tips" in addition to this presentation. Did we decide on how to publish them? (If so, we should probably reference them, and link to them, from this presentation.) If we are going to publish them, we might want to review them to make sure the message they send is consistent with the message this presentation sends, and modify them or this, or both if they aren't consistent.
Attachments
- text/html attachment: all.htm
Received on Thursday, 27 February 2003 20:50:10 UTC