- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2002 16:16:56 -0600
- To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
QAWG, Here are some issues listed as "Active" in the 2002-09-03 Issues List [1]. Note that I have added new #79 (I wanted to ensure that this outside comment on TestGL does not get lost), and I corrected the erroneous "closed" status of #64. #60: QA responsibilities of existing WGs [Ops] #39: choice of MUST/SHOULD/MAY [Ops] #64: choice of MUST/SHOULD/MAY [Spec] #49: W3C standard license for test materials [Ops] #50: liability from 3rd-party TM usage [Ops] #59: W3C standard license for submitted test materials [Ops] #32: Guidelines/checkpoints for branding [Ops] #73: require atomicity of modules [Spec] #74: scope of the minimality of level 1 [Spec] #75: relationship of modules and levels [Spec] #76: levels and profiles [Spec] #77: different requirements for legacy specifications [Spec] #78: checkpoint against implementation dependent features [Spec] #69: Discourage flavors of conformance [Spec] #61: Require standard terminology? [Spec] #15: Address/define valid conformance claims? [Spec] #51: Deprecated features [Spec] #63: all checkpoint priorities in Spec Guidelines [Spec] #13: Inter-standard and multi-standard conformance [Spec?] #68: Status of Extech parts [all-framework] #23: Tests for SHOULD/MAY [Test] #79: TestGL and "how to" guidelines [Test] #43: Relationship of "Certification Note" and Framework [Ops] #14: How to do E&O [Process?] #35: Resource supplement to other WGs [Ops] Regards, -Lofton. [1] http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/qawg-issues-html
Received on Tuesday, 3 September 2002 18:16:16 UTC