- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 10:41:12 -0600
- To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
- Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020530103937.02895430@rockynet.com>
QA Working Group -- Here is a suggested issue processing order for telcon discussion. Please speak up if you'd like to see a different order. Since we are meeting face-to-face in two weeks, it is my thought to postpone till then issues that are: ** more complex ** or, benefit from shared visual materials ** or, require more background preparation The current (2002-05-29) Issues List is at [1]. The #nn numbers below refer to the Issue numbers in the summary list at [5], which in turn are hyperlinked to the more detailed issue description. For telcon ----- #66 [Glossary]: dated versions? #62 [Ops, Spec]: conformance labels #61 [Spec]: standard terminology for classes of products #60 [Ops]: "In the charter," in ckpt statements. #69/70 [Spec]: flavors of conformance (see DM message at [4]) (clarify DM proposal, not necessarily resolve) #63 [Spec]: confirm checkpoint priorities. #64 [Spec]: use of keywords should/shall/must #57 (') [Ops] : choice of MUST/SHOULD/MAY (see [2] and references linked from [1]) For f2f? ----- (These were on a prior telcon listing.) #49 [P&O]: W3C standard license for TM #50 [P&O]: liability from 3rd-party TM usage #32 [P&O] Branding #51 [Spec]: Deprecated features #15 [Spec]: valid conformance claims. #23 [TM]: Tests for SHOULD/MAY Regards Lofton [1] http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/qawg-issues-html.html [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-qaframe-ops-20020515/ [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-qaframe-spec-20020515/ [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2002May/0040.html
Received on Thursday, 30 May 2002 12:40:40 UTC