- From: David Marston/Cambridge/IBM <david_marston@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 16:51:17 -0400
- To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
I can't help commenting on this one: >Checkpoint 1.5(1.6) >Okay, but the term "vague" needs to be changed to something a little >clearer, like intentionally undefined. If it's "intentionally undefined" then it's a discretionary item. Those are already covered under a different checkpoint. In the past, Kirill and I have used the term "vague" only to apply to things that are UNintentionally undefined, hence a mistake. .................David Marston
Received on Thursday, 20 June 2002 16:54:05 UTC