- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 10:19:07 -0600
- To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
QAWG -- this qa-chairs message is forwarded, for the WG archive and for reference at the Montreal f2f... >X-Sender: kdubost@madcow.inria.fr >Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 17:42:20 +0900 >To: qa-chairs@w3.org >From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org> >Subject: RE: chairs meetings >X-RCPT-TO: <lofton@rockynet.com> > >At 19:40 -0600 2002-04-11, Lofton Henderson wrote: >>At 07:49 PM 4/11/02 -0400, you wrote: >>>I haven't thought this through, but what I am pondering, is whether what we >>>touched on during the telcon regarding I18N, etc, a topic that is of >>>interest to other WGs or is this something that is mostly of interest to us. >>>And thus, we pursue it with each of the horizontal groups (WAI, I18N, etc). >> >>Yes, this is exactly what I'm wondering. I'd like Karl and Daniel >>perspectives. > >I think all horizontal WGs are often bored to repeat and repeat exactly >the same things for the Spec (as the QA WGs will be after a certain time). >So I think we should review our specifications and point out the >accessibility, I18N, etc issues, solve them if we think we can do it, and >if we can't ask to the respective WGs a solution or an answer. > >1. WAI, I18N, DI, etc for our own documents and recommendations. > >2. A mutual guide for Quality (as large) in Working Groups. There's a >need of a common way to write a charter for a WG and how to address >different things. > I think to a modular charter template: > - QA Module > - WAI Module > - I18N Module > etc. > >I think the guide for Member should make a chapter on that >http://www.w3.org/Guide/ > > >-- >Karl Dubost / W3C - Conformance Manager > http://www.w3.org/QA/ > > --- Be Strict To Be Cool! ---
Received on Tuesday, 11 June 2002 12:17:25 UTC