- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2002 14:25:52 -0600
- To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
QAWG -- For your information and for our archives, here is some follow up to Bert Bos' pointers to the CSS test suites [1]. I thought it would be interesting, for reference and examples, to see how CSS had handled their test assertions and linkage of same to test cases. -Lofton. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2002May/0040.html >X-Sender: boland@mailserver.nist.gov >X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.1 >Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2002 13:24:50 -0500 >To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com> >From: Tim Boland <frederick.boland@nist.gov> >Subject: Re: clarification on your question >Cc: frederick.boland@nist.gov >X-RCPT-TO: <lofton@rockynet.com> > >http://xsun.sdct.itl.nist.gov/~boland/css/ > > >At 04:06 AM 6/6/02 -0600, you wrote: >>Hi Tim, >> >>Thanks for getting back about this. >> >>Yes, I would like to see the test assertions. It is a topic now on the >>QA mail list (test assertions -- how to tag, extract, enumerate, address, >>etc). So I (we) are interested in seeing the different ways that >>different people have done it. >> >>If these are on the CSS Web site somewhere, a pointer would be ideal. If >>not on a web site ... what format are they in and how would it be best >>for us to get access to them? >> >>Thanks, >>-Lofton. >> >> >>At 09:49 AM 6/4/2002 -0500, you wrote: >>>I received a forwarded message from Bert concerning testable statements >>>in CSS1. Do you want all of the testable statements from CSS1 that I >>>found? As for how derived, I went thru spec and tried to find >>>statements that could (via first-order predicate logic? - boolean >>>algebra) evaluate to T or F using quantitative means. >>> >>>Thanks Tim >
Received on Friday, 7 June 2002 16:24:20 UTC