- From: Dimitris Dimitriadis <dimitris@ontologicon.com>
- Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 18:16:32 +0300
- To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
[Introductive wording] 1. In authoring your specifications, do you use (1 choice) as format for _authoring_ (not publishing): [] XML Spec or variety thereof [] XHTML [] HTML [] (X)HTML + div using classes to identify particular content and structure (Rationale: will give a clearer picture of what people use now.) 2. Are you using any grammar or other agreed on content structure? If so, please indicate which (does not apply if you use XML Spec) [] Yes (please indicate) [] No, but group has considered it [] No (Rationale: give a clue as to how many have looked into granular grammars and adopted it.) 3. How do you produce your published specifications? [] Lead editor/WG chair assembles parts from the editors, producing a master document [] Submit parts of document, producing the master document via script or similar solution [] Other (please indicate) (Rationale: gives goood indication as to how lead editors work when producing master documents) 4. How big a part of the editor's workload is it to stay close to a particular markup, if used? [] Less than 5% [] 5-10% [] 10-20% [] More than 20% (Rationale: up to 10% of time invested spent on grammar issues would, I think, be acceptable. Anything over that is too much to ask people to invest time in.) This concludes my action item AI-2002-06-14-04. Comments are appreciated. /Dimitris
Received on Friday, 5 July 2002 11:15:58 UTC