- From: Kirill Gavrylyuk <kirillg@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 21:19:27 -0800
- To: "Karl Dubost" <karl@w3.org>, <www-qa-wg@w3.org>
FWIW, there was a discussion on this list prior FPWD and corresponding sentence is already in the Procs&Ops as a Note to the Checkpoint 6.6. If a test suite is to be published on w3c site, we recommend to publish it in the Activity Domain. -Kirill -----Original Message----- From: Karl Dubost [mailto:karl@w3.org] Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 8:24 AM To: www-qa-wg@w3.org Subject: Test Suites in TR space The XML Protocol [1] asked me if they could publish the Test Suite [2] in the TR space as a WD or at least as a Note. I said that it may not be a good idea and I preferred that until QA WG has strongly defined a rule, I prefer that it should only be a webpage on the W3C website, and they can link from their Rec to the test suite. Lofton and I think that we need to define strong arguments in favor or against TR/ space publishing. - Updates of the Test Suite - erratas - External status (marketing, deployment) One argument of the XMLP WG is to say that it will be easier to say it's important if it's in the TR space. So it leverages the question, What status for Primers, Tutorials and Guides. [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/ [2] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/1/09/ts.html -- Karl Dubost / W3C - Conformance Manager http://www.w3.org/QA/ --- Be Strict To Be Cool! ---
Received on Wednesday, 27 February 2002 00:40:24 UTC