- From: Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 14:45:53 +0100
- To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org
I'm all in favor of the checklist being a natural part of our Framework. I think it'll be worth going thru the checklist with the WG we visit, or at least pointing them at it for self-evaluation. > QA Working Group -- > > I'd like your thoughts about this idea. > > Borrowing again from WAI, I wrote a transformation to generate a > "checklist" from the Process & Operational Guidelines (P&O). See > [1]. This was a quick prototype, so please excuse its plainness (crudeness?). > > Two things occur to me. Firstly, this ought to be a regular feature of the > "XXX Guidelines" parts of Framework. Secondly, we ought to apply this > checklist to the test activities of a few of the WGs. I think this would > have several benefits: > > 1.) It will help us refine and debug P&O Guidelines (and the other pending > guidelines parts as well). > > 2.) It might facilitate us getting feedback on the various Framework "XXX > Guidelines" parts (only P&O for now) from the WGs. > > 3.) The results of the exercise might actually be useful to the WGs (for > us to do the exercise of filling out a checklist). > > Thoughts? > > If there is interest in the idea, then we should discuss how to do it and > when. Maybe various QAWG members could each take a WG-TS that they are > familiar with (or not), and execute the checklist for that WG? About > timing ... are we too close to Cannes to make significant progress by then > (e.g., for feedback to the WGs)? Would it be better, from an archival and > WG/IG discussion perspective, to do the exercise and then communicate with > the WG over email? > > -Lofton. > > [1] http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2002/framework-20020201/ProcOps-Checklist.html
Received on Friday, 22 February 2002 08:45:56 UTC