- From: Lynne Rosenthal <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>
- Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 13:54:19 -0500
- To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
All The following is the order of topics/items that will be discussed on 18 Dec SpecGL special telecon. I've modified the list we used previously [3] and merged in some of the outstanding Issues [2]. We are working with the 8 Nov version of SpecGL [1]. If you have a preference to the proposed ordering of topics, please let me know. regards Lynne Formal Description and Examples 1.4 Provide an example for each formal description What is a formal description? Definition is unclear. Does SpecGL provide this? Suggest removing 1.4 and splitting 1.3 into 2 CPS Extensions Issue 106: Should the extensions CPs be repackaged? 9.1 Indicate if extensions are disallowed 9.2 Indicate if extensions are allowed Is there a way to combine these? Proposal: For CP, Lofton proposal [find email] For SpecGL, need to add explicit words to address the itemized list. Not have use cases or project requirements, so can’t do last MUST. Editor action Navigation requirements Issue 103: What are the fulfillment criteria for navigation requirements of CP 13.4 CP 13.4 Provide a fast way to find conformance information (David and Sandra reviews) Issues of navigation and discovery were under-represented in the checkpoints. For example, discretionary items are only detectable by a thorough reading of the entire document. Deprecation Examples Issue 104: Should CP 7.4 be rewritten to cover both producers and consumers? Does this CP apply to just producers and not consumers (the wording implies producers) Consistent terminology 13. 3 Use consistent terminology Can this be verified? What exactly is required? Should this CP be removed and left to Manual of Style and Susan L to worry about? Universal requirements 3.1 Specify any universal requirements for minimum functionality Unclear what is meant by this requirements. For the SpecGL, is Level A considered the minimum functionality? Does a specification (in our case SpecGL) need to explicitly say ‘Level A is the minimal requirement for all specifications’ Strict conformance 3.2 Identify strict conformance requirements SpecGL doesn’t explicitly specify this, although it is implied that SpecGL doesn’t do strict conformance (see conformance claim wording section 3.2, “ …meets at least all degree X conformance requirements’. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/qaframe-spec/ [2] http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/qawg-issues-html [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2002Nov/0109.html (previous list of topics)
Received on Tuesday, 17 December 2002 13:55:47 UTC