- From: Kirill Gavrylyuk <kirillg@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 19:10:55 -0800
- To: <www-qa-wg@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 13 December 2002 22:11:51 UTC
Lynne reminded me the issue brought up earlier wrt the Test GL Checkpoint 5.5: Checkpoint 5.5. Document how the results reporting allows for history/storing analysis of comments [Priority 3] Documenting the results of the tests from various versions of a product allows the implementor to investigate and compare the results. Quoting: >Actually, NIST had recommended (in its input prior to >Tokyo) >that this CP be removed specifically, WGs shouldn't need to store and >track this. This is a vendor problem I agree with NIST argumentation about removing this checkpoint in the 2nd public draft, but let's file this as an issue to not forget to resolve it in the next WG draft.
Received on Friday, 13 December 2002 22:11:51 UTC