- From: Lynne Rosenthal <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>
- Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 08:25:48 -0500
- To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
Issue: differentiate between test materials for CR and those for Recs. As part of the TestGL, we need to ensure that we address or don't preclude the reality that test suites developed at the CR stage may be different than a test suite at the Rec stage. The objectives for these test suites are often very different - for example: for CR the objective may be to 'test the specification', whereas a test suite for a Rec is targeting implementations. This was the case with XSL-FO. The tests focused on specific behavior, not entire modules, sections, etc. It tested for things outside the scope of the specification - since it wanted to see what implementers were doing so that the spec writers could determine if they wanted to refine the behavior, remove it, or make it broader. Since we advocate having tests for CR exit, we need to consider this. Thus, we need words in the Introduction and/or CPs to capture the idea that tests for CR may be different and may not need to do all the CPs in TestGL (e.g., maintenance of tests). I don't know exactly how to capture this in terms of text for the TestGL. lynne
Received on Wednesday, 11 December 2002 08:25:51 UTC