- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2002 17:46:05 -0700
- To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
- Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20021209173801.048cbec0@rockynet.com>
QA Working Group -- The act of publishing Last Call will entail some stuff that we haven't paid proper attention to yet. See [1]. For example, item #1 in [1] means that we will have to formally make a decision and be sure that it is minuted. Seattle topic, I think. An interesting question is about item #2: "The Working Group estimates which W3C Working Groups and other parties should review the last call draft. It is preferable to secure review commitments before announcing the last call." One obvious "estimate" is: EVERYONE (all WGs). According to our plan, conformance to these documents is going to be mandatory for all WGs. Perhaps there is a smaller subset, but it is not obvious. If "all" is indeed the case, then the 2nd sentence of the quote implies that we will be busy with some initial WG outreach between Seattle and 3rd February (target publication date). Thoughts? -Lofton. [1] http://www.w3.org/Guide/LastCall
Received on Monday, 9 December 2002 19:44:56 UTC