- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 10:12:55 -0600
- To: Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org
Opinions please... I want to make sure that this contribution doesn't get lost. What should we do with it: 1.) Link it from SpecGL draft for pending publication? 2.) Link it from SpecExtech draft? 3.) other? -Lofton. At 06:04 PM 8/12/02 +0200, you wrote: >Le lun 12/08/2002 à 16:08, Dominique Hazaël-Massieux a écrit : > > Another good thing would be to provide a table with the current W3C > > Recommendations and the categories where they fit [not in the framework, > > but as a companion document in /QA/ space for instance]. > >Here is an attempt of creating such a table: >http://www.w3.org/QA/2002/08/rec_categories > >I'm not sure if it will prove useful in better shaping the categories, >but at least it can help show what we mean behind them. David, could you >check that I indeed got the idea that where behind your classification? > >There a few spec that I'm unsure what category fit them best (they are >backed in green on the said page). I'm happy to take any suggestions on >them. > >Dom >-- >Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/ >W3C/INRIA >mailto:dom@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 21 August 2002 12:12:42 UTC