- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 11:33:17 -0600
- To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
QAWG -- I'm going to send a few messages, to allow you to preview draft new text. Please speak up if you have problems with any of it. This happened quickly late in the telecon. Changes to last pgph of section 1.2. The last sentence says something that we haven't articulated before... "[@@revised0819]Caveat. The set of checkpoints as a whole has been written in anticipation that the checkpoints are being applied to new, in-development specifications. It is not expected that existing specifications that pre-date these guidelines will be able to satisfy all checkpoints as they are stated. Many legacy specifications may indirectly comply with the spirit or intent of some checkpoints, without actually satisfying all requirements in those checkpoints. [@@new0819]It is a design goal of this guidelines document, to phrase checkpoint requirements and to set priorities so that well-written legacy specifications that meet the most critical requirements may qualify for conformance degree "A-conforming" (see "Conformance" chapter.)" Is it okay for SpecGL publication? -Lofton.
Received on Wednesday, 14 August 2002 13:33:11 UTC