Re: Draft Minutes 2001-12-06 QA Working Group Teleconference

> http://www.w3.org/QA/Group/2001/12/07-QA-logistics.html

thanks Olivier, useful work.

first my answer to questions in the page: >

> QA documents
>    Public drafts (and more advanced documents) shall be linked from
>    (and possibly, kept at) /TR 
>    QUESTION: Drafts in progress are currently in public QA
>    space. Should we move them to member QA space? (tranquility VS
>    openness commitment)

public, same model as with all WAI guidelines group: all wg level
stuff is publicly accessible but not publicized widely

> QA resources
>   QA resources are to be distinguished from QA documents. Resources
>   are linked from /QA/#resources (now)WG agenda and minutes 
>   Agenda should be in /QA/WG. Agenda can be put at /QA/Agenda, but
>   minutes should not (this is WG and IG space). Minutes should be Public
>   readable. Minutes shall be linked from /QA/WG Minutes URI : depends on
>   whether they have a web page or are email-based 
>   web'd minutes should be /QA/YYYY/MM/DD-minutes(-(irc|rdf)) Minutes
>   should be announced and copied (independant of the web VS e-mail
>   choice) in the list(s) 
>   QUESTION: should minutes be sent to www-qa, www-qa-wg or both?

My proposal is to send the text of the minutes to www-qa-wg, where it
can be linked from the wg pages, and a short message can be sent to
the www-qa (IG list) by the WG chairs pointing at the minutes.


Regarding WG/IG organization, I think the data on the page you just
made should be splitted in QA/WG and QA/IG space respectively, so that 
they look more like say, the http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA page.

Received on Wednesday, 12 December 2001 09:29:03 UTC