www-patentpolicy-comment@w3.org from January 2003 by date

Wednesday, 29 January 2003

• Urge approval of draft policy Alex Jacques
• Rutgers and VoiceXML - please do your best _not_ to give Rutgers Ed Allen Smith

Saturday, 25 January 2003

• Acacia Research software patent claim for streaming media robert mudry
• Summary of 13 January 2003 Patent Policy Working Group Teleconference Susan Lesch
• Re: MS views on Last Call Patent Policy Draft D F

Friday, 24 January 2003

• Re: MS views on Last Call Patent Policy Draft Pete Ryland

Wednesday, 22 January 2003

• Some more background info on MS' views Peter Berenyi
• Standardization process à la Microsoft Peter Berenyi

Monday, 20 January 2003

• SBC Pursuing "RAND" Patent on Website Navigation Seth Johnson

Sunday, 19 January 2003

• SPI response to Microsoft comment of January 16. Bruce Perens

Saturday, 18 January 2003

• Comments on Microsoft's views Gervase Markham
• A response to Microsoft's carefully worded letter Eric M. Hopper

Friday, 17 January 2003

• Approve of draft policy - disapprove of software patenting. Michael Spahn

Thursday, 16 January 2003

• MS views on Last Call Patent Policy Draft David Turner

Tuesday, 14 January 2003

• Approve of draft disapprove of software patenting. John Pisini
• Summary of 6 January 2003 Patent Policy Working Group Teleconference Susan Lesch

Monday, 13 January 2003

• [www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Hubbard, Marc
• No software patents! Pontus Johannisson

Sunday, 12 January 2003

• Comments on the W3C patent policy Adrián De León
• Disagree with the "field of use" restriction Alex Borges (lex)

Thursday, 9 January 2003

• Approve of draft policy - disapprove of software patenting. Mark Janssen

Tuesday, 31 December 2002

• Patent policy call for comments. vsedach@ucalgary.ca
• adopt royalty-free draft policy Andre Lehovich
• no limits Geert Stappers
• Proposed Patient Policy (Section 3 ) / GPL (Section 7) Paul Lewis

Monday, 30 December 2002

• proposed web standards Gene Heskett

Tuesday, 31 December 2002

• "field of use" Daliel Leite

Wednesday, 1 January 2003

• Patent Policy working draft: RF licensing requirements Ralph Clark

Tuesday, 31 December 2002

• Please ensure patent policy is GPL compliant John Dalton

Monday, 30 December 2002

• No 'field of use' patent restrictions Jim Bray

Tuesday, 31 December 2002

• So-called Patent Policy "bug" of Section 3.3 Dave McFadden

Monday, 30 December 2002

• NO on "Royalty-Free Patent Policy" Ron@Dotson.net

Tuesday, 31 December 2002

• Section 3 of the W3C's proposed patent policy markem
• patent policy Edward Welbourne

Monday, 30 December 2002

• www patentpolicy comment stephan wehner
• patentholders have failed; please fix section 3, items 3 and 7 James Salsman

Wednesday, 1 January 2003

• Approve of draft policy - disapprove of software patenting. Lourens Steenkamp

Monday, 30 December 2002

• final call Joe Gasiorek

Tuesday, 31 December 2002

• field of use restrictions must go Syd Bauman
• W3C Royalty-Free Patent Policy Last Call Denton_Sam@emc.com
• W3C's proposed patent policy. Andres L. Figari

Monday, 30 December 2002

• royalty-free for web-only use is a dangerous and unwise limitation Jason Lunz

Tuesday, 31 December 2002

• Feedback Mads Sejersen

Monday, 30 December 2002

• No 'field of use' patent restrictions Kevin D. McAllister
• My opinion counts... Lincoln Bertram
• comment on current draft of W3C patent policy Bryan

Tuesday, 31 December 2002

• Patent Policy - I disapprove of software patents James Nachlin

Monday, 30 December 2002

• I believe bill@wadley.org

Tuesday, 31 December 2002

• Comments: the "field of use" restrictions DFox

Monday, 30 December 2002

• Section 3.3 Clark McGrew

Tuesday, 31 December 2002

• Comment on W3C Royalty-Free Patent Policy Mike Strean
• comment on W3C Royalty-Free Patent Policy Wallwork, Nathan
• Comment Terra Info
• W3C Patent Policy Feedback Jason Bechtel

Wednesday, 1 January 2003

• Comments about the proposed patent policy Brett Smith

Tuesday, 31 December 2002

• W3C's proposed patent policy Slim
• Section 3 of proposed patent policy proclus@gnu-darwin.org
• no loopholes! Jacob Kjome
• Please approve draft policy; disapprove of software patents. James Bromberger
• Comments on patent policy jlnance@intrex.net
• Comments: W3C Royalty-Free Patent Policy Last Call Working Draft Cory Trese

Monday, 30 December 2002

• Comment on Clause 3 of Section 3 of draft policy Stanley A. Klein

Tuesday, 31 December 2002

• Royalty-free W3C policies Michael S. Keller
• Draft policy, good; software patenting, bad Michael Poole
• And about freedom? Charles
• Field of use conflict between section 3 item 3 and the GPL Jeff Michel
• Comments for the 'field of use' restriction in Section 3, Item 3 of proposed W3C patents policy Jason Lee
• Approve of draft policy - disapprove of software patenting. Christopher Hicks
• Royalty-Free Patent Policy and the GPL Liam Morland
• Comments: the "field of use" restrictions in Section 3 Item 3 of the proposed W3C Patents Policy David Kaufman
• Draft policy approval Rikard Anglerud

Monday, 30 December 2002

• Royalty-Free Patent Policy Francis Smit

Tuesday, 31 December 2002

• comment B. Chandler
• Comment on section 3 item 3. David GLAUDE Mailing
• Field of use provision Doug Winter
• Proposed patent Policy problem - i.e. Field of Use clause Andy Farnsworth
• Open Source Licencing and Patent encumbrance Brian
• Worried about possible non-approval of draft policy Nick Phillips
• DISAPPROVE of draft policy Sonam Chauhan

Tuesday, 7 January 2003

• Royalty-Free Patent Policy Feedback Steve Murphy

Wednesday, 1 January 2003

• [www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Nickolai Dobrynin

Tuesday, 7 January 2003

• Objection to "field of use" restriction Ben North

Tuesday, 31 December 2002

• Comments on 'W3C Royalty-Free Patent Policy Last Call Working Draft' Jesper Juhl
• Last Call comment on the patent policy of the W3C Myron
• please remove "fields-of-use" restrictions Andrea Borgia
• Life paul
• Prohibit the imposition of "field of use" restrictions on patent claims contributed to W3C standards Doran Barton

Monday, 30 December 2002

• Comment rob@printf.org

Sunday, 29 December 2002

• So nearly there... Gervase Markham

Tuesday, 31 December 2002

• Draft Patent Policy Paul C. Bryan

Monday, 30 December 2002

• Item 3 of Section 3: W3C Royalty-Free (RF) Licensing Requirements Dave Owen (Los Angeles)

Tuesday, 31 December 2002

• Comment: Free Software Community Arpad Biro
• standards must not be subject to patents Justin Chen-Wells

Wednesday, 1 January 2003

• I grudgingly approve of the draft policy Steve Langasek

Tuesday, 31 December 2002

• Last call: Royalty-Free Patent Policy Håkon Wium Lie

Monday, 30 December 2002

• Regarding Royalty-Free Patent Policy, sec. 3, item 3 soso@busymonkey.org

Sunday, 29 December 2002

• On W3 Consortium "Royalty-Free" Patent Policy Lukasz M. Pogoda

Tuesday, 31 December 2002

• In favour of draft policy - against software patenting Winston Neutel
• Approve of draft policy - disapprove of software patenting Pierre Machard
• Draft Patent Policy Comment John K. Hohm
• Royalty-Free Patent Policy: Request for Change in Section 3, Item 3 venugopalm@vmoksha.com

Monday, 30 December 2002

• W3C Royalty-Free Patent Policy Last Call Working Draft Comment Adam Warner
• FSF position on Section 3 Bruce Badger

Tuesday, 7 January 2003

• Summary of 16 December 2002 Patent Policy Working Group Teleconference Susan Lesch

Tuesday, 31 December 2002

• Section 3(3) needs to be amended Joachim Achtzehnter

Monday, 6 January 2003

• W3 Policy: Up with draft, down with software patents Asheesh Laroia

Tuesday, 31 December 2002

• Draft policy not ideal but acceptable Brock Frazier

Monday, 6 January 2003

• Approve of draft policy - disapprove of software patenting. Éric Depagne

Thursday, 2 January 2003

• Approve of draft policy - disapprove of software patenting. Denis Braekhus

Tuesday, 31 December 2002

• Comments on patent policy Arno Peters

Sunday, 5 January 2003

• Your patent policy problem with free software Ondrej Jombik

Monday, 30 December 2002

• How free becomes too costly Jerry Asher

Sunday, 5 January 2003

• Pass W3C Patent Policy David Teague

Tuesday, 31 December 2002

• Royalty-Free Patent Policy GPL Encumbrance = Bad News Zack Johnson

Sunday, 5 January 2003

• Standards are . . . Seth Johnson

Tuesday, 31 December 2002

• Approve of draft policy - disapprove of software patenting. Alexander Schmehl
• Bug in the proposed draft jonathon
• The Future of the W3C (Patent Policy) Colin Bell
• Royalty-Free Patent Policy elka@gnosistem.com

Monday, 30 December 2002

• I fully support the FSF position on the proposed "Royalty-Free" Patent Policy Lance Heller

Tuesday, 31 December 2002

• Partially royalty-free patents Andrew Moise
• Last call working draft comments Ward Vandewege
• Amend Consortium Patent Policy "RF" patent Provision Michael Labhard

Friday, 3 January 2003

• Against Item 3 of Section 3 of the proposed Policy on Patents Jay Sulzberger

Monday, 30 December 2002

• [www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Kendall Helmstetter Gelner

Tuesday, 31 December 2002

• re:FSF's Position on Proposed W3 Consortium "Royalty-Free" Patent Policy Arvan Reese
• Patent Policy Edward Welbourne
• Re: Royalty-Free Patent Policy correction Benjamin Johnson
• Royalty-Free Patent Policy correction Benjamin Johnson
• Approve of draft policy - disapprove of software patenting. Middleton, Michael
• Please drop the "Field of Use" clause. MJ Ray
• Support draft policy; Open Source implementations are essential Emile van Bergen
• I object to the "Royalty-Free" Patent Policy. Chris Seager

Friday, 3 January 2003

• [Resend] So nearly there... Gervase Markham

Tuesday, 31 December 2002

• Do not accept "field of use" restriction David Allouche

Monday, 30 December 2002

• Comments on W3C Patents Policy Mark P Sullivan

Tuesday, 31 December 2002

• W3C Draft Policy on Royalty-Free Patents D F
• Patent policy draft w3ccomment@nickwillson.com

Friday, 3 January 2003

• Section 3, Item 3 Freedom Advocate

Tuesday, 31 December 2002

• Call for Comments: W3C Royalty-Free Patent Policy Last Call Working Draft Mike S

Monday, 30 December 2002

• objection to field of use restrictions Brian Gough

Tuesday, 31 December 2002

• Approval of draft policy on Software Patenting Alan Chandler
• 'Field of Use' restriction Peter Abramowicz
• Approve of draft policy - disapprove of software patenting atmcneil@earthlink.net
• Royalty Free Patent Policy C. Conrad Cady
• Disapprove of software patents, PERIOD. Michael Upchurch

Thursday, 2 January 2003

• Re: archive system bug Ted Guild

Tuesday, 31 December 2002

• Please keep the standards open and patent free dtwarnick@mmm.com
• Disagree with the "field of use" restriction Alex Borges (lex)

Thursday, 2 January 2003

• archive system bug Daniel Weitzner

Tuesday, 31 December 2002

• Comments on W3C Royalty-Free Patent Policy Stephen Scherer
• Approve of draft policy - disapprove of software patenting. Kevin Caswick

Wednesday, 1 January 2003

• Another Comment That Failed to Get Posted Seth Johnson
• Patent Policy Comments That Failed to Get Posted Seth Johnson

Last message date: Thursday, 30 January 2003 14:01:58 UTC