- From: Susan Lesch <lesch@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 08:00:46 -0800
- To: www-patentpolicy-comment@w3.org
Hello, Eighteen people attended the 18 March 2002 Patent Policy Working Group (PPWG) teleconference. The group discussed their agenda. This meeting was devoted to a report from the optional features Task Force concerning required and optional features and the definition of Essential Claims. The Task Force thinks that the terms "normative" and "informative" are more useful in these respects than RFC 2119 key words like MUST. They resolved to their satisfaction the case of open-ended lists of ways to implement a Recommendation as they are optional. The PPWG tried to specify a default case for closed lists. One person suggested that patents required to implement required features be written into the Recommendation and that required items in a closed list be marked Royalty-Free. There was an alternate view that closed lists not be Royalty-Free. The group agreed to think about the Task Force report for one week and then vote. The PPWG will meet next on 25 March. Best wishes, -- Susan Lesch http://www.w3.org/People/Lesch/ mailto:lesch@w3.org tel:+1.858.483.4819 World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) http://www.w3.org/
Received on Thursday, 21 March 2002 11:00:48 UTC